| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3757 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | awoo | 165 |
| 3 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 155 |
| 6 | nor | 154 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Weak test case for problem 1771C (Problem no C of last round)
I wasn't happy with the time complexity of my solution. So, I was looking for a solution with improved time complexity. And I found this. This guy solved this problem by only checking the first 200 elements after each index and comparing GCD of each pair . He won with the power of probability!
His submission: 184781213
Test Case result should be Yes. His solution prints No
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en1 |
|
AshrafSustS19 | 2022-12-12 07:10:08 | 1416 | Initial revision (published) |
