harsh-apcr's blog

By harsh-apcr, history, 7 weeks ago, In English

Given two arrays of integers $$$x$$$ and $$$y$$$, of length $$$n$$$, find a partition of indices $$${1, \ldots, n}$$$ such that you minimise the score, where the score of a partition $$$S_1, S_2$$$ is defined as $$$\max(\sum \limits_{j \in S_1} x[j], \sum \limits_{j \in S_2} y[j])$$$

just find the minimum score that can be achieved, I fancy a dp approach, any help is appreciated, thanks

EDIT : assume the sums of $$$x$$$ and $$$y$$$ are bounded above by $$$M$$$, then a solution with time complexity parametrised by $$$M$$$ might be good

  • Vote: I like it
  • +10
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
7 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -10 Vote: I do not like it

Why don't you just iterate over both of the arrays, and for each index take the smaller value (min(x[i], y[i])) ???

  • »
    »
    7 weeks ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

    Hi, sorry, I don't think that would work, consider $$$x = 2, 5, 3$$$ and $$$y = 3, 4, 2$$$

    then you'd select $$$2$$$ from $$$x$$$ and $$$4, 2$$$ from $$$y$$$ giving you a score of $$$6$$$ whereas optimal is $$$5$$$, i.e. $$$2, 3$$$ from $$$x$$$ and $$$4$$$ from $$$y$$$.

»
7 weeks ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

What constraints are we looking for here? If I understand the problem correctly then $$$x=y$$$ seems strictly harder than the partition problem, which is NP-complete, so I don't think there's anything polynomial.

  • »
    »
    7 weeks ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    yes I believe so too, I took the problem from an OA and it didn't had any constraints mentioned, I think it may help to assume $$$max(\sum_i x[i], \sum_i y[i])$$$ is bounded by say $$$M$$$, then time complexity in terms of $$$M$$$ may be good