№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3690 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 173 |
2 | awoo | 164 |
3 | adamant | 163 |
4 | TheScrasse | 160 |
5 | nor | 157 |
6 | maroonrk | 156 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | Petr | 146 |
8 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
-8
Спасибо! |
+80
I prefer Taster |
+5
Yep, tests where tree is a bamboo must be so close for maximum test for this solution, and the last subtask also contains this tests. |
0
Wow, thanks. It's really cool trick. I tried to cut off solutions with bad time complexity (what is hard when main complexity is $$$O(n\sqrt{n}$$$ $$$log n)$$$), but I didn't expect this. |
0
Excuse me, I didn't understand why your solution is faster than $$$O(nm)$$$. Do you visit all vertices on simple path for each query? My solution used this technique with $$$O(\sqrt{n})$$$ for update and $$$O(\sqrt{n}$$$ $$$log$$$ $$$n)$$$ to get answer. |
+16
But you are from MIT |
Название |
---|